Armed Forces Grievances Redressal Commission

On the 25th Sep 2016 at Kozhikode, Kerala, Major AK Dhanapalan, The National President, Bharath Rekshak Party, met the Hon’Ble Rekhsha Matri Sri Manohar Parrikarji and discussed the following points relating to the Ex-servicemen Fraternity:-

  1. ARMED FORCES GRIEVANCES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

The H’ble Supreme Court on 15/11/2010 suggesed for constituation of seperate COMMISSION  to examine the Pay/pension and other grievances of the Armed Forces Personnel and the Ex-servicemen. The BJP has made it a point in their Election Manefesto also.

On the 11 March 2016, H’ble Mininister of State Sri RAO INDERJIT SINGH Ji made a statement in the Parliament that “In pursuance of Hon’Ble President’s Statement made in the Address to the Joint Session of Parliament on 9th Jun 2014, regarding Govt’s decision to appoint a Veterans Commission, the National Commission for Ex-servicemen Bill 2015 has been drafted.  The comments Department of Legistative Affairs and Department of Administrative reforms and Public Grievances have been obtained.  The matter is under consideration of the Goverment.” This was in response to an Unstarred Qeustion No.2474 by Shi MAHEISH GIRRI.

We rquest to expedite the issue without  any further loss of time.

(we may recollect here,  In the connected matter, W.P (Civil) No.291/2010 – “Pushpawanti  Vs  UO I” , the Hon’ble court was pleased to order the Govt to consider setting up of an independent Commission headed by a retired SC Judge “for looking into all grievances of the serving and former memebers of the Armed Forces.  We feel this is necessary as the armed forces personnel have many grievances which they feel are not being properly addressed by the Union Goverment. Pointing out that the widow of a war veteran had approached the SC questioning the logic of paying her a meagre pension of Rs.70/- , the bench said this was the treatment meted out to highly decorated officers “it is shameful” that the Govt had allowed such a case to come to Supreme Court”Does it require a case?” What are you people upto? It is very demoralising for the Armed Force” THE BENCH TOLD THE SG).

  1. RESETTLEMENT OF EX-SERVICEMEN

Armed Forces Personnel are retiring  at a very early age i.e. before attaining the age of 60 years.  No financial support OR re-settlement package is available to them.  The Jawans who leave service at the age of 35-45 find it very dificult to support the family, educate the children, look after the old parents, getting mariage of young sisters etc.  It is highly essential to provide alternate appointment  and protect the salary drawn.  A National  Ex-servicemen settlement Policy  is a very long outstanding  requirement  of the Ex-servicemen in the country. A National Policy should be made.

  1. DISABILITIES

A National Policy  on protection of disabled Armed Forces Personnel do not exist.  Equal opportunities of right and full participation Act 1995 enable a Civilian Employee if get disabled  whether on duty or off duty,  whether due to service or otherwise, whether due to his own negligencies or not, his/her services are protected. If the employee is NOT able to work, still he/she is to be kept on supernumerary strength and paid full pay and allowances till the age of 60 years.  WHEREAS the Armed Forces personnel injured/diabled will be sent home, some time may be wihout pension on flimsy reasons. This is inhuman.

The equal opportunities of Right and Full Participation Act 1995 should also be made applicable to Armed Forces.

And TSEWA is exploring the feasibility filing  a case in AFT Delhi or PIL in SC on Protection of Disabled Armed Forces Personnel under The Equal opportunities and Full Participation Act 1995 pointed out Maj AK Dhanapalan 

6 Comments

  1. Sanjeev Kumar,EXPOELP,116276-R

    Sir I nSanjeev Kumar EXPOELP,116276-R is ex-POELP of indian navy I joined navy on 05Aug1994 and retired from there on 31Aug2009 and presently getting pension at PNB Boring Road Sir I want to inform you that I am getting medical disability pension also which is very less just rs-854/- since sixth pay commission after new pay commission it should increase since 13 years it is same so do the needfull.My Mobile no is 8235149125

    April 13, 2022 Reply
  2. Honorable Sir/ Madam,

    Sub.:Pension fixation with additional increment
    Retired on 30th June due on 1st.July.

    May i draw your kind attention towards following few lines.
    Since introduction of 6th Pay Commission Rules award of yearly increment was shifted to 1st July every year for all govt. servants. Central (or State) Govt. Servants who retire on 30th June though they completed 12 months service since award of last increment are not given increment as I do no not continue in service on 1st July the next day.I have been retired (Pensioned) from Indian Navy on 30/06/1984 on completion of 16 Yrs. 03 Months 12 Days service, my DOB
    15/02/1952.Kindly look in to the matter/advice for said benefit .

    Thanking You

    REGARDS
    Gautam Kumar Ghosh

    March 5, 2020 Reply
  3. Honorable Sir/ Madam,

    Sub.:Pension fixation with additional increment
    Retired on 30th June due on 1st.July.

    May i draw your kind attention towards following few lines.
    Since introduction of 6th Pay Commission Rules award of yearly increment was shifted to 1st July every year for all govt. servants. Central (or State) Govt. Servants who retire on 30th June though they completed 12 months service since award of last increment are not given increment as I do no not continue in service on 1st July the next day.I have been retired (Pensioned) from Indian Navy on 30/06/1984 on completion of 16 Yrs. 03 Months 12 Days service, my DOB
    15/02/1952.Kindly look in to the matter/advice for said benefit .

    Thanking You

    REGARDS
    Gautam Kumar Ghosh

    Reply
    Shyam Bihari Rastogi says:

    March 5, 2020 Reply
  4. Honorable Sir Madam,

    Sub.:Pension fixation with additional increment
    Retired on 30th June due on 1st.July.

    May i draw your kind attention towards following few lines.
    Since introduction of 6th Pay Commission Rules award of yearly increment was shifted to 1st July every year for all govt. servants. Central (or State) Govt. Servants who retire on 30th June though they completed 12 months service since award of last increment are not given increment as I do no not continue in service on 1st July the next day.I have been retired (Pensioned) from Indian Navy on 30/06/1984 on completion of 16 Yrs. 03 Months 12 Days service, my DOB
    15/02/1952.Kindly look in to the matter/advice for said benefit .

    Thanking You

    REGARDS
    Gautam Kumar Ghosh

    March 5, 2020 Reply
  5. Dear sir , I Shyam Bihari Rastogi ex leading seaman bearing no 054863R. I retired on 30 Oct 1983 .At the time of retirement I was issued with Pension book PPO No. N/S/C/3174/83 and discharge cirtificate which I have lost. Since my retirement in 1983 I have not been issued any letter/PPO/corresponces. Now I have been applied for ECHS card vide app 0000992313 in the month of Jan 2019 . The following is pending at record office for observation ” the name of spouse Manju bala and date of birth 12 Mar 1952 as per records.” Her correct name Manju Bala Rastogi ( mentioned in pension book ) and her correct date of birth is 13 May 1954 ( as per all documents held with me ). I have sent mails to Naval Pay Office in this regards. I have also sent 4 speed post letters for each correction in record , providing of latest PPO,chage of address etc. I request you to kindly look in to matter and do the needful. Regards Shyam Bihari Rastogi Mob no. 9936117775

    February 29, 2020 Reply
  6. A very good initiative to rehatch the TSEWA Blog and we are thankful to Smt Rekha Sekhri wife of Lt Col Raj Sekhri, for her voluntary contribution in designing the Blog with the latest user friendly “Word Press”. We all as members of “The Great TSEWA” tender our Applause in great appreciation. Thanks a million.

    October 30, 2016 Reply

Leave a Reply to Shyam Bihari Rastogi Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Translate »