Info re AFT Cases filed by TSEWA
Dear Members of TSEWA, The article below clearly states larger bench of AFT Chandigarh ruled that arrears are to be paid from date of failure of Govt of India to give a benefit illegally denied or not implementing judgment of hon’ble Courts. I sent earlier a newspaper cutting of ruling of larger bench of AFT Chandigarh. […]
Memo of Parties OA 34/2016 I am posting the Memo of Parties of OA 34/2016 (AFT 1) which is an extract of the case filed therefore there can be no omission of name/s in the list. This for info of all TSEWA members who have some kind of doubts in their minds regarding their names
Dear Sir, Many Officers especially of the rank of Majors / Lt Cdrs / Sqn Ldrs are asking me the difference in legal cases filed / being filed by TSEWA in AFTs. The legal cases for which clarification is being sought are AFT – 1 (OA – 34/2016), AFT – 28, AFT – 29 and
Dear Sir, Majors / Lt Cdrs / Sqn Ldrs have always suffered from 5th CPC (Jan 1996) onwards. Their initial pay was enhanced to Rs 11,925 (from 11600) but only from 29 Feb 2000. All those who were promoted as Majors did not get their arrears due to enhanced minimum pay of Rs 11,925. The SAI
Dear All, Copies of the Judgement and letters to various record offices for action in respect of OA 1677/2016 are att for your info please. However, it is for the info of all that an MA is being filed by the Advocate for certain corrections required in the date of retirement of few offrs in
BENEFIT OF JOINING LEGAL CASE AFT – 1B OF TSEWA Dear Sir, A Capt IN (TS) sent me the comparative table showing how a Pre – 2006 Officer retired in March 2005 got fixed pension at Minimum of pay scale in Jan 2006 (in 6thCPC) and how a Capt IN(TS) with much lesser service
DRAFT REPRESENTATION TO SERVICE HQ FROM PETITIONERS OF AFT – 29 A CASE OF T SEWA TO BE FILED IN AFT DELHI Dear Petitioners of AFT – 29 A, Thank you very much for joining AFT – 29A in such large numbers. We did not expect such flood of petitioners to join this case. Of
